Palmerston North Hospital · July 3, 2026

How Low Can You Go

Platelets, Penguins & Ghost Policies

An evidence-based recalibration of procedural platelet count thresholds

Roman Vasilev · Specialist Anaesthetist 1
The case that started it all
G2P1, 32 years old, admitted next week for delivery. Big baby — would benefit from epidural. Platelet count 78,000. Anaesthetist reviewed — requests platelet count above 80,000 before proceeding.

No verdict yet. Just the facts as they were presented.

Case vignette — gestational thrombocytopenia 2
The case that started it all
G2P1, 32 years old, admitted next week for delivery. Big baby — would benefit from epidural. Platelet count 78,000. Anaesthetist reviewed — requests platelet count above 80,000 before proceeding.

No verdict yet. Just the facts as they were presented.

QR code — scan to join the quiz

Scan to join the quiz

Interactive quiz — scan to participate 3

Results

Quiz results & answer key 4
Problem

Ghost Policies: What Are They?

A clinical practice rule — whether unwritten or buried in an unreviewed protocol — found in no published guideline, sustained by habit, enforced as if it were institutional policy.

Example: “Plt < 80K? No epidural.”

Ghost policies are not benign. They override evidence-based guidelines with institutional habit — and patients pay the price.
Ghost policies — unwritten, un-evidenced, unchallenged 5

What other ghost policies do you know?

Pause for discussion 6

Well-Recognised Ghost Policies
in Anaesthesiology

  • “Nil by mouth after midnight”
    Rigid 6–8 h fasting — despite clear fluids clearing the stomach in <2 h (ASA 2017/2023; ESA-IC 2022)
  • “Hold all regular meds — patient is NPO
    ASA 2012: essential meds should continue with sips of water. β-blocker withdrawal → 2–4× perioperative MI risk
  • “Cricoid pressure prevents aspiration”
    Sellick 1961 (n=26), never proven in an RCT. NAP4: aspiration in 50% of airway deaths regardless. Birenbaum 2019 RCT: no difference
  • “Preload with crystalloid before spinal”
    Ni 2017 meta-analysis (10 RCTs, n=824): preload 57.8% hypotension vs coload 47.1% (OR 1.62). Vasopressors are what matter
  • “Trendelenburg for hypotension”
    Geerts 2012: increases preload for ≤1 min — baroreceptor resetting eliminates the effect. Leg raise more effective, plus no ventilation impairment or ICP rise
  • “Aspirin = no neuraxial”
    ASRA 2025: NSAIDs “do not create a level of risk that will interfere with neuraxial block.” Confusion with P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel) which DO require 5–7 day hold
How many of these have you heard in theatre this month? 7

More Ghost Policies

  • “Routine coagulation screen before neuraxial”
    ASA guidelines: history & exam sufficient. van Veen 2010: routine PT/APTT has near-zero predictive value. Chee 2008: “not recommended”
  • “Spinal contraindicated in severe aortic stenosis”
    Titrated epidural or low-dose spinal may be safer than GA — individualised risk assessment, not an absolute
  • “No adrenaline in digital blocks”
    Ilicki 2015: 2,797 blocks, zero ischaemic complications. The 48 pre-1950 cases were procaine (pH ~1), not adrenaline. 1,111 modern cases — zero necrosis
  • “Ketamine contraindicated in raised ICP
    Zeiler 2018 systematic review: no ICP elevation in TBI. 1970s studies had uncontrolled CO₂ — ICP rise was CO₂-mediated
  • “No Hartmann's in renal failure — the potassium will cause hyperkalaemia”
    Contains only 5 mmol/L K+ — less than a banana. SMART secondary analysis 2021: patients WITH hyperkalemia had less progression to severe K+ and half the need for RRT with balanced crystalloids vs saline. The “safe” saline makes it worse (hyperchloremic acidosis → transcellular K+ shift)
How many of these have you heard in theatre this month? 8
Origins

How Ghost was born

Bromage PR 1993 — Neurologic Complications of Regional Anesthesia for Obstetrics · In: Shnider SM, Levinson G, eds. Anesthesia for Obstetrics. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993:443–4

Early textbook authority in obstetric anaesthesia. Widely referenced by subsequent authors and guideline committees as the foundational word on neuraxial safety in thrombocytopenia.

Historical Anaesthesia Texts — The <100,000 Limit

The <100,000/µL threshold was largely popularised in the 1990s by textbook authors and early authorities like Dr Charles Bromage. These texts carried enormous weight — before systematic reviews, before MPOG, before the Rule of Three — and became the de facto standard for a generation of anaesthetists.

How this became a ghost policy: A textbook opinion, written by a respected authority before any outcome data existed, was absorbed into training programs and departmental protocols as an absolute rule. The severity of the consequence (paralysis) eclipsed the rarity of the event.
100K ghost — Textbook authority pre-dates all outcome evidence 9
Origins

How Ghost was born

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 177 — Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia · April 2017 · PMID 28333821

"Epidural and spinal analgesia or anesthesia generally are considered acceptable in a patient with a platelet count greater than or equal to 80,000/microliter provided that the platelet level is stable, there is no other acquired or congenital coagulopathy, the platelet function is normal, and the patient is not receiving any antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy."

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 207 — Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy · March 2019 · PMID 30801478

"No studies have evaluated the lower limit of platelet count for safe, neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia. There are no data to support a specific minimum platelet count for regional anesthesia, and each case must be considered individually."

"The risk of epidural hematoma … in a parturient with a platelet count of more than 70 × 10⁹/L is exceptionally low (less than 0.2%)."

How this became a ghost policy: ACOG PB 177 (2017) explicitly named 80,000 — a real guideline, not a rumour. But ACOG themselves updated their position. PB 207 (March 2019) stated there are "no data to support a specific minimum platelet count" and adopted 70K as the evidence-based threshold. The guideline moved. The ghost stayed frozen at 80K — enforced in departments that never read the update. The four safety conditions (stable count, no coagulopathy, normal function, no antiplatelet/anticoag) survived unchanged — but the number was evidence-based, not evidence-frozen.
80K ghost — ACOG set it in 2017. ACOG abandoned it in 2019. The ghost didn't. 10
Origins

How Ghost was born

Cochrane 2016/2018 (Estcourt et al.) — Platelet transfusion prior to neuraxial procedures · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · PMID 29709077

"We found no evidence from RCTs or non-randomised studies on which to base an assessment of the correct platelet transfusion threshold prior to insertion of a lumbar puncture needle or epidural catheter."

Zero randomised controlled trials. Zero non-randomised studies. Three decades of practice built on nothing but expert opinion — and a textbook chapter from 1993.

"An evidence-based absolute 'safe' platelet count value does not exist."
— International Pain & Spine Intervention Society, 2024
The three ghosts — a common DNA: All three thresholds share the same origin pattern. 100K: a textbook opinion (Bromage 1993) that predates all outcome data. 80K: a real guideline (ACOG 2017) that the guideline authors themselves abandoned two years later — but departments never updated. 50K: a transfusion trigger ("consider platelets above 50K") transformed into a procedural ban — with zero RCT evidence for any threshold. In every case: expert opinion became absolute rule. The evidence moved. The ghosts didn't.
50K ghost — Transfusion trigger became procedural ban. Cochrane: zero RCTs support any threshold. 11
Origins

How They Survive

01

I was trained to do it like this

Cultural transmission

02

We've always done it this way

Institutional inertia

03

Someone told me it was the rule

Oral tradition

Ghost policies survive because no one questions them — and Bolitho says that's not a defence 12
Why this matters

The Cost of Ghost Policies

Clinical Harm

  • Denying neuraxial → more general anaesthetics
  • GA in obstetrics: significant morbidity and mortality
  • Unnecessary treatment
  • Delays, prolonged admissions, wasted blood products

NZ Medicolegal Risk

  • HDC Right 4(2): services must comply with professional standards → MCNZ requires evidence-based practice
  • Right 6: patients entitled to know guidelines support proceeding at ≥70K
  • Bolitho: practice contradicted by all published guidelines cannot withstand logical scrutiny
  • “You must always be prepared to explain your decisions” — MCNZ Good Medical Practice
13
Evidence

What Guidelines Actually Say

GuidelineRecommendationReference
SOAP 2021 ≥70K → Proceed  
50–70K → Competing risks may justify  
<50K → Avoid
SOAP 2021 Interdisciplinary Consensus Statement on Neuraxial Procedures in Obstetric Patients with Thrombocytopenia. Anesth Analg 2021;132:1531–1544.
ACOG PB 207 / 2019 "No data to support a specific minimum platelet count for regional anesthesia." Plt ≥70K: risk exceptionally low (<0.2%). Plt <70K: individual risk-benefit decision. Conditions: stable count, no coagulopathy, normal function, no antiplatelet/anticoag. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 207: Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e181–e193. PMID: 30801478
MPOG 2017 573 neuraxial with Plt <100K (MPOG) + 951 literature = 1,524 combined — zero epidural haematomas. Stratified: ≥70K ≤0.2%, 50–69K ≤3.4%, <50K ≤11% Lee LO, et al. Risk of Epidural Hematoma after Neuraxial Techniques in Thrombocytopenic Parturients. Anesthesiology 2017;126:1053–1063. PMID: 28383323
AAGBI / RA-UK 2013 ITP/Gestational: 50–75K increased risk, 20–50K high risk
Pre-eclampsia: <75K very high risk (if abnormal coags)
Harrop-Griffiths W, et al. Regional anaesthesia and patients with abnormalities of coagulation. Anaesthesia 2013;68:966–972. PMID: 23905877
ANZ ITP 2022 ≥70 × 10⁹/L is reasonable for neuraxial (GRADE 2D) Choi PY-I, et al. Australian and New Zealand consensus statement on the management of immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Med J Aust 2022;217:43–51.
Bauer Meta-analysis 2019 Inflection point at 75K — below this, risk increases (19,000+ procedures) Bauer ME, et al. Lumbar neuraxial procedures in thrombocytopenic patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2019;57:103–110. PMID: 31810860
14
Evidence

The Big Numbers

Moen 2004

Sweden, 1990–1999 · Nationwide registry

200,000

obstetric epidurals

  • 2 spinal haematomas in the entire obstetric population
  • Both patients had HELLP syndrome — systemic coagulopathy, not isolated thrombocytopenia
  • Across ALL populations (1.7 million neuraxial blocks): 33 spinal haematomas total — coagulopathy in 11, IV heparin in 18, thrombocytopenia in 5, ankylosing spondylitis in 5

Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe Neurological Complications after Central Neuraxial Blockades in Sweden 1990–1999. Anesthesiology 2004;101:950–959. PMID: 15448529

NAP3 2009

United Kingdom · 1-year prospective audit

320,425

obstetric neuraxial blocks

  • Zero spinal haematomas in the obstetric population
  • Largest prospective audit of neuraxial complications ever conducted
  • Confirmed obstetric patients are a lower-risk population for epidural haematoma
  • Benchmark for the "observing zero" statistical problem

Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JAW. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the Third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:179–190. PMID: 19139027

Together: 520,425 obstetric neuraxials — 2 haematomas, both with systemic coagulopathy 15
Statistical reasoning

Zero Observations — But what are the odds?

Observing zero events is not the same as zero risk 16
Statistical reasoning

Interpreting “Zero”: The Rule of Three

The Rule of Three

  • Hanley & Lippman-Hand, JAMA 1983 — a landmark paper addressing exactly this problem
  • Calculates the maximum possible risk with 95% confidence when zero events are observed
  • Formula: Maximum Risk ≈ 3 / n (where n = sample size)

In plain English: If you observe zero events, the true rate could still be as high as 3/n — you just got lucky. With 95% confidence, it's no higher than that. The "3" comes from −ln(0.05) ≈ 2.9957.

“If you flip a coin 3 times and get zero heads, you'd have no confidence the coin was fair. But flip it 300 times and still get zero heads — you're confident the probability of heads is less than about 1%.”

Applying It to the Obstetric Data

Lee et al. (2017): MPOG 573 + systematic review 951 = 1,524 thrombocytopenic parturients (combined). Zero epidural haematomas.

Plt RangenMax Risk (95% CI)
0–49,00027≤11% (~1:9)
50–69,00089≤3.4% (~1:30)
70–100,0001,286≤0.2% (~1:429)

The ≥70K group has a maximum SEH risk of 0.2% — ≤1:429. This is where the evidence-based consensus threshold comes from. Not 80K. Not 100K. 70K.

Below 70K, uncertainty widens fast — exactly why guidelines recommend individualised assessment rather than a single cutoff.

Independent corroboration: Goodier et al. 173 parturients → upper 95% CI 0.6%. Bernstein et al. 256 parturients → upper 95% CI 0.4%. Same range, same answer, different populations.

Source: Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If Nothing Goes Wrong, Is Everything All Right? Interpreting Zero Numerators. JAMA 1983;249:1743–1745.

17
Caveats

Rule of Three: Limitations & Why We Still Use It

Critical Limitations

  1. It's an approximation. The “3” is a convenient rounding of −ln(0.05) = 2.9957
  2. Assumes perfect data. Doesn't account for selection bias (academic centres only) or publication bias (zero-event studies less likely published)
  3. Ignores prior knowledge. A Bayesian approach would start with our existing belief that SEH is rare — the true estimated risk would be even lower

Why We Still Use It

  1. Simple and universal. All major papers in this field use it — creates a common language for discussing risk
  2. Usefully conservative. The critiques suggest the true risk is likely even lower than the Rule-of-Three ceiling
  3. Clinically actionable. ≤0.2% max SEH risk for Plt ≥70K (≤1:429); 3.4% for 50–69K; 11% for <50K. GA carries its own real risks (failed intubation 1:224–1:808). Both matter — ghost policies ignore both sides of the ledger.

By using the 0.2% figure, we are presenting a conservative, worst-case scenario that is still incredibly reassuring compared to the alternatives.

Critique informed by: Winkler RL, et al. J Am Stat Assoc 2002. Bayesian perspective: Gelman A, et al. Bayesian Data Analysis 3rd ed. 2013, Chapter 2.8.

18
Risk comparison

The Hidden Risk: GA vs Neuraxial

General Anaesthesia (Obstetric)

1:224–1:808

Failed tracheal intubation in obstetric GA (range: Quinn BJA 2013 → DREAMY 2021)

Of those failed intubations, case fatality rate:

1:90

Maternal deaths per failed intubation (Kinsella, IJOA 2015)

Absolute risk of maternal death from GA (airway):

≈1:20,000–1:72,000

= failed intubation rate × case fatality rate

  • Aspiration: full stomach in labour
  • Hypertensive response to laryngoscopy
  • Uterine atony from volatile agents
  • No neuraxial opioids for post-op analgesia

Spinal Epidural Haematoma

~1:200,000

General obstetric population (Moen, Anesthesiology 2004)

320,425

NAP3 2009: UK obstetric neuraxial blocks — zero spinal haematomas

Zero cases

In 573 neuraxials with Plt <100K (MPOG 2017)

Mitigations:

  • 95% of SEH present symptoms within 48h
  • Early decompressive laminectomy (<8h) is critical
  • Enhanced neurological monitoring detects signs
  • Low-concentration LA + opioid preserves motor function

Zero penguins in the car park ≠ no penguins in the world

19
Clinical reasoning

Why Platelet Count Can Mislead

  • Platelet count measures quantity, NOT function
  • ITP / gestational: low count but young, large, hyperfunctional platelets — count underestimates haemostatic capacity
  • Cirrhosis / liver disease: normal count may mask severe platelet dysfunction
  • CKD / uraemia: normal count + dysfunctional platelets
  • No correlation between platelet count and surgical bleeding (Slichter, Transfus Med Rev 2004)
Count ≠ function. The same number means different things depending on aetiology.
20
Beyond the count

TEG / ROTEM: Looking Beyond the Count

Clinical Role

  • SOAP 2021: insufficient evidence for routine use — consider in equivocal cases
  • PFA-100: insufficient evidence (SOAP, AAGBI)
  • Best used when count is borderline and aetiology uncertain

Normal TEG/ROTEM is reassuring; abnormal should prompt caution

21
Clinical approach

Workup for the Low Platelet Count Patient

History & Exam

  • Bleeding history (epistaxis, gingival, menorrhagia, bruising)
  • Medications (heparin, NSAIDs, aspirin, anticonvulsants)
  • Previous platelet counts — acute vs chronic?
  • Hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, petechiae
  • Pregnancy: pre-eclampsia features, BP, urinalysis

Laboratory Workup

  • FBC + blood film (pseudothrombocytopenia? schistocytes?)
  • Coagulation screen (PT, aPTT, fibrinogen)
  • Liver function tests, creatinine
  • TEG/ROTEM — if available and count borderline

Pattern Recognition

AetiologyCountFunctionBleeding Risk
GestationalNormal/↑Low
ITP↓↓Normal/↑Variable
Pre-eclampsia/HELLPHigh
Liver diseaseVariable↓↓High
DIC↓↓↓↓Very high

Decision Framework

  • ≥70K + no coagulopathy + reassuring history → proceed
  • 50–70K + ITP/gestational → risk-benefit discussion
  • <50K or concerning aetiology → consult haematology
22
Local context

NZ & Australian Guidelines

ANZCA

  • Endorses NBA Patient Blood Management Guidelines (2023–24)
  • NBA Module 2: Perioperative (ANZCA endorsed)
  • NBA Module 5: Obstetrics (ANZCA endorsed)
  • No standalone ANZCA platelet threshold guideline exists
  • References AAGBI/RA-UK 2013 in practice

ANZ ITP Consensus 2022

  • ≥70 × 10⁹/L is reasonable for neuraxial anaesthesia
  • GRADE 2D (weak recommendation, low quality evidence)
  • Consider haematology referral for counts <50K
  • IVIg or corticosteroids can boost pre-delivery counts
  • “Individual risk-benefit assessment is essential”

NZ Blood Service

  • NZBS follows ANZSBT guidance
  • Not procedure-specific thresholds
  • Prophylactic: Plt <10K (no bleeding) or <20K (with risk factors)
  • Therapeutic: active bleeding + Plt <50K

ANZCA has no independent platelet threshold guideline — it endorses NBA and ANZ ITP consensus. AAGBI 2013 and SOAP 2021 are the most clinically useful references.

23
Action

Practical Decision Algorithm for Neuraxial

Assess Aetiology

ITP / Gestational? Pre-eclampsia, DIC, sepsis, liver disease?

Aetiology determines true bleeding risk

Check Trend

Stable or rising → more permissive. Falling rapidly → more cautious.

Trajectory matters more than absolute nadir

Platelet Count

≥70K → Proceed (SOAP/AAGBI)
50–70K → Risk-benefit discussion
<50K → Avoid; consult haematology

Risk-Benefit Analysis

GA risk vs SEH risk. Difficult airway? Obesity? Labour? GA may be the riskier option.

Document reasoning

Mitigations

Experienced operator · Low-concentration LA + opioid · Enhanced neuro monitoring × 48h

Patient education — red flags (95% present ≤48h):

Leg weakness (59%) · Back pain (41%) · Bladder/bowel dysfunction (27%) · Numbness/tingling (23%) · Saddle anaesthesia (9%)

Adapted from: SOAP 2021, AAGBI 2013, ACOG PB 207 (2019), Bauer et al. 2019; Zheng et al. 2024.

24
Summary

Replace Ghost Policies With Evidence

#RecommendationRationale
1Individualised Risk-Benefit AssessmentReplace rigid thresholds with documented clinical judgement
2≥70K = Evidence-Based Green ZoneSOAP, AAGBI, ANZ ITP consensus all support neuraxial at ≥70K
3GA Is NOT the “Safe” DefaultFailed intubation 1:224–1:808; case fatality per failed attempt 1:90 — GA has real, quantifiable risks that should factor into the decision alongside SEH risk
4Platelet Count ≠ FunctionITP: low count, normal function. Pre-eclampsia: opposite. Aetiology matters
5Document & AuditRecord aetiology, trend, guidelines, risk-benefit. Audit neuraxial denial rates
6Mitigate Bleeding RiskUS-guided technique + experienced operator + atraumatic needle + low-concentration LA
✓ Ghost policies deny patients optimal care. ≥70K is the evidence-based consensus — backed by ≤0.2% max SEH risk in 1,286 patients.
25
Appendix

Procedure Thresholds at a Glance

Invasive Procedures

ProcedurePlt/μLSource
CVC (US-guided, IJ/SCV)20,000BCSH 2016; PACER: ≥30K for tunneled/haem
Lumbar Puncture40,000van Veen 2009; BCSH 2016
Arterial Line (radial)No specificSIR — compressible site
PICC Line20,000Similar to CVC; compressible
Intercostal Drain50,000NICE NG24
General / Abdominal Surgery50,000NICE NG24; 50–75K for high-risk
PACER Trial (NEJM 2023): US-guided CVC in Plt 10–50K: 11.9% grade 2–4 bleeding without transfusion vs 4.8% with. No grade 4 bleeding in either group. Net savings $410/catheter.

Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Risk TierPlt/μLExamples
● Low (superficial, compressible)≥50KFascia iliaca, femoral, axillary, popliteal, ankle/wrist
● Intermediate (deeper, partial)≥50–75KInterscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, adductor canal
● High (deep, non-compressible)≥75K (treat as neuraxial)Lumbar plexus, deep cervical, stellate, coeliac

Sources: PACER — van Baarle et al. NEJM 2023. PNB — AAGBI/RA-UK 2013 Table 2; ASRA 5th Ed 2025. Invasive — BCSH 2016; NICE NG24; SIR 2019.

26

References

[1] SOAP 2021 — Neuraxial procedures in thrombocytopenic obstetric patients. Anesth Analg. PMID 33861047

[2] AAGBI/RA-UK 2013 — Regional anaesthesia & coagulation abnormalities. Anaesthesia. PMID 23905877

[3] Bauer 2019 — Neuraxial procedures in thrombocytopenia: meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. PMID 31810860

[4] van Veen 2010 — Spinal haematoma risk in thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. PMID 19775301

[5] Lee MPOG 2017 — Epidural hematoma in thrombocytopenic parturients. Anesthesiology. PMID 28383323

[6] van Baarle PACER 2023 — Platelet transfusion before CVC placement. NEJM. PMID 37224197

[7] Estcourt Cochrane 2016/2018 — No RCTs on platelet thresholds for neuraxial. PMID 29709077

[8] NICE NG24 2015 — Blood transfusion guideline. nice.org.uk/guidance/ng24

[9] BCSH 2017 — Guidelines for platelet transfusions. Br J Haematol. PMID 28009056

[9a] BCSH 2003 — Guidelines for the use of platelet transfusions. Br J Haematol 2003;122:10–23. PMID 12823341

[10] ANZ ITP 2022 — Management of adult ITP in Australia & NZ. Med J Aust. PMID 34628650

[11] NBA PBM 2023–24 — Patient blood management guidelines. blood.gov.au

[12] NAP3 2009 — Major complications of neuraxial block in UK. Br J Anaesth. PMID 19139027

[13] Bhardwaj 2017 — Coagulopathies: TEG, ROTEM, Sonoclot analysis. Ann Card Anaesth. PMID 28393783

[14] Kinsella 2015 — Failed intubation in obstetric GA: review. Int J Obstet Anesth. PMID 26303751

[14a] Quinn 2013 — Failed intubation: UK case-control. Br J Anaesth. PMID 22986421

[14b] DREAMY 2021 — GA for obstetric surgery in England. Anaesthesia. PMID 32959372

[15] Moen 2004 — Neurological complications after neuraxial block. Anesthesiology. PMID 15448529

[16] SIR 2019 — Periprocedural bleeding risk management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. PMID 31229333

[17] Hanley 1983 — Rule of Three: interpreting zero numerators. JAMA. PMID 6827763

[18] Slichter 2004 — Platelet count & bleeding risk. Transfus Med Rev. PMID 15248165

[19] Lind 1991 — Bleeding time does not predict surgical bleeding. Blood. PMID 2043759

[23] Zheng P, Hao D, Christolias G, et al. FactFinders for Patient Safety: Delaying Epidural Steroid Injections — Infection and Safe Platelet Cutoff. Interv Pain Med 2024;3(1):100383. PMID 39239505

[24] ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 207: Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:e181–e193. PMID 30801478

[25] ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 177: Obstetric Analgesia and Anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e73–e89. PMID 28333821

27
Reference

Abbreviation Key

Guidelines & Organisations

SOAP — Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology

AAGBI — Association of Anaesthetists of GB & Ireland

ANZCA — Australian & NZ College of Anaesthetists

ANZ ITP — ANZ Immune Thrombocytopenia Consensus

BCSH — British Committee for Standards in Haematology

NICE — National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

NBA — National Blood Authority (Australia)

NZBS — New Zealand Blood Service

ANZSBT — ANZ Society of Blood Transfusion

SIR — Society of Interventional Radiology

MCNZ — Medical Council of New Zealand

HDC — Health and Disability Commissioner

Regulatory

HDC Code — NZ Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights

Bolitho — Bolitho v City and Hackney HA [1997] (logical basis test)

Databases & Trials

MPOG — Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group

PACER — Platelet Transfusion before CVC Placement trial

NAP3 — Third National Audit Project (RCoA)

DREAMY — GA for Obstetric Surgery in England study

Cochrane — Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clinical Terms

ITP — Immune Thrombocytopenia

SEH — Spinal Epidural Haematoma

GA — General Anaesthesia

TRALI — Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury

TACO — Transfusion-Associated Circulatory Overload

TEG — Thromboelastography

ROTEM — Rotational Thromboelastometry

PFA-100 — Platelet Function Analyzer-100

RCT — Randomised Controlled Trial

CVC — Central Venous Catheter

HELLP — Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets

DIC — Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

Reference Key — abbreviations expanded 28

Thank You

Questions & Discussion

"If you see zero penguins in 1,286 commutes, you're ≤0.2% confident of seeing one tomorrow."

Roman Vasilev · Specialist Anaesthetist · Palmerston North Hospital

Prepared June 2026 — evidence current as of May 2026

Zero randomised controlled trials. Zero non-randomised studies. Three decades of practice built on nothing but expert opinion — and a textbook chapter from 1993. 29
← / → · space